Overview

Many past development contracts have not included reliability development testing (Test, Analyze, and Fix (TAAF) methodology), instead relying on a reliability qualification test to demonstrate a numerical MTBF requirement. This approach has been ineffective in providing weapon systems with acceptable field reliabilities. Reliability development (TAAF) testing using simulated mission profile environments and emphasizing reliability growth has proven to be a more effective use of limited test resources, and has reduced the risk of transitioning systems from development to production.


TRAPS
Reliability qualification (demonstration) test is required

Design changes are implemented during low rate initial production

Reliability development (TAAF) test is planned as a separate entity

Reliability development testing is performed during FSD

TEST
INTEGRATED
TEST
UNIFORM
TEST
REPORT
DESIGN
LIMIT
TAAF
FAILURE REPORTING SYSTEM
SOFTWARE
TEST
LIFE
FIELD
FEEDBACK







TEST, ANALYZE, AND FIX (TAAF)